• 16+
  • English
  • Русский
 Education and Self Development
  Menu
Skip to content
  • Home
  • Current number
  • Archive
  • Scope Statement
  • Editorial Team
    • Editors
    • Editorial Council
    • Editorial Board
  • Ethical Policy
  • News
  • For Reviewers
  • Submit an Article

Editorial: Quality vs quantity: a study of experience in education

  Download PDF
  Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.26907/esd.20.2.01
  Volume Number: 20 | Issue Number: 2 | Pages: 6 - 8
  Published: June 2025
  Article Author(s) - listed alphabetically: Tatiana Baklashova
  Bookmark the permalink

Modern education systems are characterised by the quality paradigm (Biggs et al., 2022; Sallis, 2014). Policy-makers, education experts, and scholars prioritise advancing the teaching methods, enhancing the knowledge and the research-based solutions to the problems of education irrespective of the development level of the education system. A study of experience in education becomes all the more important for the quality of education paradigm (Boud et al., 2013; Neubauer et al., 2019). It becomes a valuable resource for the further international development of education systems; it stimulates teacher’s professional self-development and contributes to their research competence. Furthermore, a study of experience reveals new methods and strategies of education, facilitating higher efficiency in teaching. Several scholars focus on the assessment of education programmes’ methodology and effectiveness (Tatur, 2017). It drives an identification and analysis of the specific educational results, and a determination of students’ knowledge gaps and lack of practical skills (Carmichael et al., 2018; Markova & Narkoziev, 2019; McDavid et al., 2018). Case studies conducted in a research-based manner are a valid means of updating the ongoing education programmes.
Quantitative studies of the education system sometimes prove to be somewhat limited due to their focus on mainly measurable variables. This might compromise research on complicated and complex phenomena. Social, cultural, and contextual aspects might not be taken into consideration despite their relevance to the validity of research. Identifying the underlying origins of correlations in a study and their explanation may also pose a problem, thus greatly limiting the in-depth comprehension of the phenomena. The scholars emphasise that quantitative studies might oversimplify complex phenomena under study while omitting the nuances and peculiarities relevant to their full comprehension (Pregoner, 2024). The study data often requires considerable time, funding, and expertise, as well. In addition, quantitative research relies on a predetermined approach to data collection and analysis, thereby complicating the required changes in the research plan or further questions to be asked during data gathering.

Further Reading

  Teachers’ continuous training and inclusive education – A critical stance supported by teachers’ narratives
E&SD 20(2) June 2025  

Search Site

Journal Information

Publisher

Education and Self Development (E&SD) is published by Kazan Federal University (KFU)
See http://kpfu.ru/eng

Contact

"Education and Self Development"
Office 59, 1 Mezhlauk Street
Kazan 420021
Russia Federation

  +7 (843) 221 3475
  +7 (917) 904 9885
  samorazvitie@mail.ru

ISSN

ISSN 1991-7740

Frequency of Publication

E&SD publishes four print issues each year. It was established in June 2006

Impact Factor and Ranking

The Journal has been accepted for inclusion in Scopus and is applying for inclusion in Web of Science. At present it has not established an impact factor or ranking but these will be forthcoming.

Open Access

E&SD is an online, open access journal fully funded by Kazan Federal University. The Journal is a signatory to the Budapest Open Access Initiative and is committed to ensuring that all of the articles we publish are freely available. Articles are available to all without charge, and there are no article processing charges (APCs) for authors.

Scope Statement

Available here…

Article Keywords

assessment bibliometric analysis blended learning communication competence Covid-19 creativity critical thinking distance learning education educational environment educational process educational standard evaluation foreign language future teachers higher education identity inclusive education lifelong learning model motivation multicultural education non-formal education pedagogy personality professional competence professional development professional orientation psychological safety quality quality of education reading comprehension reflection self-assessment self-development students teacher teacher education teacher professional development teachers teacher training training upbringing values

Article Authors

Albina R. Drozdikova-Zaripova Alena Hašková Andreja Istenic Starcic Andreja Istenič Anna I. Akhmetzyanova Anna Kobtseva Aydar Kalimullin Aydar M. Kalimullin Aydar Minimansurovich Kalimullin Balwant Singh Branka Radulović Daria Medvedeva Dinara Bisimbaeva Elena Ibragimova Evgeniya Shishova Evsyukova E.A. Fatemeh Khonamri Ian Menter Idiyatov I.E. Ilshat R. Gafurov Kadriya Shakirova Liliana Shakirova Lira V. Artishcheva Lyubov A. Kochemasova Martina Pavlikova Mourat Tchoshanov Musa Nushi Natalya N. Kalatskaya Nick Rushby Oksana Kozhevnikova Olga K. Evdokimova Rezeda M. Khusainova Roza A. Valeeva Roza Valeeva Rushby N.J Tatiana Baklashova Valerian Faritovich Gabdulchakov Venera Zakirova Vera K. Vlasova Vera Khotinets Vera Vlasova Violeta Rosanda Vsevolod V. Andreev Yulia Novgorodova Zdenka Gadušová

Join Our Mailing List

Sign up to receive news about E&SD

Click here (opens in new window)

© 2025 Education and Self Development | All Rights Reserved

Bespoke WordPress development by Philip K Meadows